Modifying the AHS Consent for COVID-19 Immunization Form
Dr. Dennis Modry is a renowned heart surgeon and former CEO of the Alberta Prosperity Project, but his expertise in immunology is a lesser-known aspect of his impressive resume. Dr. Modry’s background in immunology stems from his postdoctorate studies at Stanford University, where he delved into the complexities of the immune system and its responses to various diseases and foreign substances.
Immunology is a branch of biomedical science that focuses on the study of the immune system, including how it functions, how it interacts with other systems in the body, and how it can be manipulated to fight off infections and diseases. Dr. Modry’s postdoctorate studies at Stanford would have provided him with a deep understanding of the immune system’s intricacies and the latest advancements in immunological research.
Dr. Modry’s expertise in immunology is particularly relevant in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as he has written a report on modifying the AHS consent form for COVID-19 immunization. This report likely draws on his knowledge of immunology to provide scientific, legal, and political rationale for suggested changes to the consent form.
Having a background in immunology gives Dr. Modry a unique perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic and the development of vaccines. His understanding of how the immune system responds to vaccines and the importance of informed consent in the vaccination process would be invaluable in shaping public health policies and strategies.
Independent article on vaccine mandates.
Dr. Dennis Modry is a renowned heart surgeon and CEO who has dedicated nearly 30 years to the heart and lung transplant program. Throughout his career, he has developed a clear understanding of immunosuppression and the body’s immune response, which has been crucial in his work as the director of the critical care unit and in collaboration with infectious disease specialists.
In a recent podcast, Dr. Modry discussed his involvement in drafting an independent article on vaccine mandates. The article was co-authored by Dr. Modry, four other scientists, two constitutional lawyers, and one individual who is the VP of Policy and Governance on the UCP Board of Directors. The authorship was split between scientific, legal, and political perspectives, with each contributor bringing their expertise to the table.
The genesis of the article can be traced back to a meeting Dr. Modry had with the Minister of Health, Adriana Lagrange, on December 12th. During the meeting, the Minister posed a question that sparked a conversation leading to the creation of the article. It was important for the authors to address the scientific, legal, and political aspects of vaccine mandates, drawing on their collective knowledge and insights to present a comprehensive argument.
Dr. Modry’s background in immunology and his experience as a heart surgeon make him a valuable voice in discussions surrounding vaccines, immunization, and public health. His postdoctorate studies at Stanford University have equipped him with a deep understanding of the immune system and its complexities, allowing him to contribute valuable insights to the ongoing debate on vaccine mandates.
New information calls for action.
“New information calls for action” is a phrase that encapsulates the essence of Dr. Dennis Modry’s recent podcast discussion on the potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines. As a renowned heart surgeon and CEO, Dr. Modry’s expertise in immunology brings a unique perspective to the conversation surrounding vaccine safety and informed consent.
In the podcast, Dr. Modry recounts a conversation with Adriana Lagrange, where she raised concerns about the presence of plasma DNA in the vials used for COVID-19 vaccinations. This led Dr. Modry to investigate further and engage with scientists and legal experts to understand the potential risks associated with the vaccines. Through this process, he uncovered troubling evidence of plasma DNA, simian virus 40 fragments, and frame shifting in the vaccines, all of which have the potential to cause harm.
The key takeaway from Dr. Modry’s investigation is the importance of informed consent and the need for updated information to guide decision-making. He emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in healthcare policy, particularly when it comes to public health interventions like vaccination campaigns. Dr. Modry’s call to action is clear: new information requires a proactive response to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
In drafting the article on modifying the Alberta Health Services (AHS) consent form for COVID-19 immunization, Dr. Modry and his co-authors provide a roadmap for how to address the emerging concerns around vaccine safety. By including additional information on potential risks and ensuring that individuals understand the implications of their choices, the updated consent form aims to empower individuals to make informed decisions about their health.
Moreover, Dr. Modry’s advocacy for protecting healthcare providers from liability demonstrates a holistic approach to addressing the complexities of vaccine safety. By acknowledging the legal and political implications of vaccine mandates, Dr. Modry underscores the importance of a comprehensive strategy that considers all stakeholders involved.
Trust the science and experts.
The phrase “trust the science and experts” has become a common refrain in discussions surrounding public health and healthcare policy. In a recent podcast, Dr. Dennis Modry, a renowned heart surgeon and CEO, emphasized the importance of relying on scientific evidence and expert opinion when making decisions about vaccines and other medical interventions.
Dr. Modry’s assertion that he may not have fully understood the scientific details presented in a document about vaccine ingredients, but trusted the experts who had analyzed the information, highlights the key principle behind trusting the science and experts. While not everyone may have the scientific background to fully comprehend complex medical information, it is essential to defer to those who do – the experts who have dedicated their careers to studying and understanding these issues.
In the context of vaccines, trusting the science and experts means accepting the overwhelming consensus among medical professionals and researchers that vaccines are safe and effective at preventing the spread of infectious diseases. This consensus is based on years of rigorous scientific research and clinical trials, which have demonstrated the benefits of vaccination in protecting individuals and communities from potentially deadly diseases.
When it comes to making decisions about healthcare policy, including vaccine mandates, it is crucial to rely on the expertise of professionals like Dr. Modry, who have the knowledge and experience to assess the risks and benefits of different interventions. By trusting the science and experts, policymakers can make informed decisions that prioritize public health and safety.
Plasma DNA in mRNA vaccines.
The podcast transcript discusses the presence of plasma DNA in mRNA vaccines and raises concerns about potential risks associated with this discovery. The presence of plasma DNA in the vials containing mRNA vaccines exceeds regulatory levels by tens to hundreds of times when measured using fluorometry, a different technique than the one typically used to measure plasma DNA levels. This poses a significant risk as the plasma DNA, along with the SV40 simian virus promoter present in the vaccines, could potentially facilitate the entrance of plasma DNA into the cell nucleus and alter the DNA.
The podcast also highlights the history of the SV40 virus, which was found in polio vaccines in the late 1950s and later linked to various types of cancers. While the cause and effect relationship between SV40 and cancer has not been definitively established, there is suggestive evidence of a potential link. Given the potential risks associated with plasma DNA and SV40 in mRNA vaccines, the podcast recommends that individuals receiving these vaccines be informed of the new evidence and potential risks through a revised consent form.
Furthermore, the podcast suggests that policymakers meet with scientific, legal, and political experts to clarify any uncertainties and consider funding research to ensure the safety of mRNA vaccines. It also emphasizes the importance of considering alternative perspectives and questioning the motivations behind scientific publications and mainstream media narratives.
Consent form deficiencies need fixing.
The podcast discussion sheds light on the deficiencies in consent forms for COVID-19 immunization and raises important questions about the necessity of fixing these deficiencies. The conversation highlights the importance of informed consent and transparency in the administration of vaccines, particularly in light of recent concerns surrounding the potential risks of plasma DNA in mRNA vaccines.
One key issue raised in the podcast is the lack of clarity and specificity in the consent forms for COVID-19 immunization. The guest speaker points out that the current form is deficient in a number of ways, and efforts are being made to address these deficiencies through recommendations. This lack of clarity and specificity in the consent form raises concerns about whether individuals fully understand the implications and potential risks of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.
Furthermore, the podcast touches on the broader issue of informed consent in vaccination practices. The host reflects on their experience with signing consent forms for their children’s vaccinations and questions whether similar forms are now required for other common vaccines. The guest speaker suggests that in the current era of litigation, it is likely that consent forms are now required for most vaccines, regardless of their long-standing safety record. This raises questions about the necessity of informed consent and the need for individuals to be fully aware of the risks and benefits of vaccination.
The podcast also delves into the importance of conducting proper trials and investigations to ensure the safety and efficacy of vaccines. The guest speaker emphasizes the need for targeted investigations into specific areas of concern, such as the effect of plasma DNA and the SD40 promoter in mRNA vaccines. They caution against rushing into repeat clinical trials without addressing these concerns, as doing so could pose risks to participants.
Informed consent crucial for vaccinations.
Informed consent is crucial for vaccinations, as highlighted in the podcast transcript. The conversation between the host and the guest emphasizes the importance of ensuring that individuals have access to accurate and comprehensive information before making decisions about receiving a vaccine. The guest emphasizes that choice must be based on sufficient information, and individuals should be fully informed about the potential risks and benefits of vaccination.
One key recommendation made in the podcast is to modify consent forms to ensure that healthcare providers thoroughly explain the information to patients before they sign. This not only empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health but also educates healthcare professionals about the latest research and evidence regarding vaccines. By prioritizing informed consent, individuals can take responsibility for their own health decisions and be better equipped to assess the risks and benefits of vaccination.
Furthermore, the podcast discusses the importance of ongoing research and investigation into the long-term effects of vaccines, including potential risks such as cancer formation. By acknowledging the need for continued scientific inquiry and transparency in vaccine development, individuals can have confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccines. This highlights the importance of policies that prioritize informed consent and rigorous scientific investigation to protect public health and safety.
Modify vaccine consent form now.
The podcast highlights the importance of modifying vaccine consent forms to ensure that individuals are fully informed about the potential risks and benefits of receiving a vaccine. The suggested changes to the consent form include providing information on the limitations of the vaccine in preventing illness and transmission, the potential risks of repeated booster doses, and the presence of plasma DNA with unclear health risks. By including this information in the consent form, individuals can make more informed decisions about whether to proceed with vaccination.
One of the key points raised in the podcast is the evolving nature of scientific knowledge surrounding vaccines. The speakers emphasize that as new evidence emerges, it is important to update consent forms to reflect the most current understanding of vaccine efficacy and safety. By acknowledging the uncertainties and potential risks associated with vaccines, individuals can make decisions that align with their values and priorities.
Furthermore, the podcast highlights the need for healthcare providers to be adequately informed about the potential risks and benefits of vaccines. By ensuring that healthcare professionals are well-educated on the latest research and evidence, they can provide accurate and comprehensive information to patients, enabling them to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
The podcast also touches on the importance of legal oversight in ensuring that consent forms accurately reflect the risks and benefits of vaccines. By involving legal experts in the review and revision of consent forms, healthcare organizations can ensure that the language is clear, accurate, and legally sound.
Informed consent crucial for safety.
The podcast highlights the importance of informed consent in the context of vaccine administration, particularly in the case of mRNA vaccines. Dr. Mowdery emphasizes the need for healthcare organizations to update their consent forms to reflect the potential risks associated with repeated booster doses and the presence of certain contaminants in vaccines. By providing individuals with accurate and comprehensive information about the vaccines they are receiving, healthcare providers can empower patients to make informed decisions about their own health.
Informed consent is a fundamental principle in medical ethics that ensures individuals have the right to make autonomous decisions about their healthcare. It requires healthcare providers to disclose relevant information about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a proposed treatment or intervention, allowing patients to weigh the potential consequences and make an informed choice. In the case of vaccines, informed consent is essential to building trust between healthcare providers and patients and promoting vaccine uptake in the community.
The podcast also raises concerns about the potential risks associated with new mRNA vaccines, such as those being developed for a potential bird flu outbreak. Dr. Mowdery emphasizes the importance of rigorous testing and verification of vaccine safety before widespread distribution, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in the vaccine development process. By requiring manufacturers to prove the absence of contaminants and potential harmful effects, healthcare organizations can ensure that vaccines meet the highest standards of safety and efficacy.
Question the necessity of vaccines.
Furthermore, the podcast raises important questions about the necessity of vaccines, particularly in the context of COVID-19 vaccination for young children. The speakers argue that there is zero justification for administering the COVID-19 vaccine to young children, especially given the lack of evidence on its effectiveness and potential risks. They advocate for respecting individual choice and autonomy when it comes to vaccination, suggesting that young children should not be required to take the vaccine at all.
The podcast also highlights the importance of considering the potential risks and benefits of vaccines, particularly in light of emerging data and research. The speakers point out that some vaccines may not be thoroughly evaluated for certain risks, such as carcinogenicity or fertility impairment, raising concerns about their long-term effects. By questioning the necessity of vaccines and advocating for more comprehensive research and transparency in vaccine development, individuals can make more informed decisions about their health and well-being.
Moreover, the podcast addresses the evolving definition of vaccines, noting that the concept of a vaccine has shifted from preventing diseases to merely reducing symptoms. This change in definition raises questions about the effectiveness and necessity of repeated booster shots, as well as the long-term implications of multiple vaccinations on individual health. By questioning the evolving nature of vaccines and advocating for a more holistic approach to vaccination, individuals can better understand the risks and benefits of vaccination and make informed choices about their healthcare.
Question the need for boosters.
The podcast raises important questions about the need for boosters and the potential risks associated with multiple doses of vaccines. It challenges the narrative that more boosters are always better and suggests that individuals should question the effectiveness and safety of these additional doses. The conversation highlights the importance of being informed and educated about the potential risks and benefits of vaccines before making a decision to receive them.
One of the key points made in the podcast is that the greater number of boosters a person receives, the higher the risk of contracting the virus. This raises concerns about the impact of boosters on the immune system and whether they may actually weaken the body’s ability to fight off infections. The podcast emphasizes the need for more research and data to understand the long-term effects of multiple vaccine doses and the potential risks they may pose.
The podcast also touches on the issue of informed consent and individual choice when it comes to receiving vaccines. It highlights the importance of being aware of the potential risks and benefits of vaccines and making a decision based on personal beliefs and values. The podcast suggests that individuals should question the need for boosters and consider whether they are truly necessary for their health and well-being.
Stay informed, get involved.
The podcast also emphasizes the importance of getting involved in discussions and events related to healthcare and government policies. It highlights upcoming conferences and events where individuals can engage in conversations about important issues, such as healthcare independence and government accountability. By attending these events and participating in discussions, individuals can stay informed about current events and policies that affect their lives and communities.
Furthermore, the podcast encourages listeners to take action by reaching out to their elected officials, participating in local government meetings, and getting involved in grassroots movements. By actively engaging in the political process, individuals can advocate for policies that align with their values and priorities, including healthcare reform and government transparency. This level of involvement can have a significant impact on shaping the future of healthcare and government policies.
In conclusion, the podcast “A Dose of Truth” serves as a reminder of the importance of staying informed about healthcare issues and government policies, as well as the need for active participation in discussions and events. By staying informed and getting involved, individuals can contribute to a more transparent and accountable healthcare system and government, ultimately leading to better outcomes for all. It is essential for individuals to take an active role in shaping the future of healthcare and government policies by staying informed, engaging in discussions, and advocating for change.